Another Seismic Shift in Publishing Land: How Will it Affect Writers and Agents?

If the merger between Random House and Penguin really goes through, let me tell you how that is going to narrow authors’ chances at getting agents, and agents’ chances of having a title accepted: a lot. From my own experience with a very good agent who had/has made a name for herself, an agent can only submit to one editor of a house, even if that editor is one of twenty editors in one of twenty publishing houses that are under the umbrella of a big name like, uh let’s see. . . . Random House, the largest publishing house in the world.

Penguin Group is owned by Pearson. I am familiar with this company because the Pearson representative for textbooks in my part of Central California can be communicated with by email only and will send out the requested exam copy that teachers express an interest in. However, Bedford-St. Martins, A U.S. company specializing in Humanities textbooks for colleges, is owned by the Bedford, Freeman and Worth Publishing Group owned by the Stuttgart, Germany-based George Von Holtzbrink Publishing Group.

The Bedford-St. Martins local book rep is someone I consider a friend, who meets me for coffee to discuss the new batch of books for next semester’s classes along with any other teachers I can get to come along. Then we discuss the book publishing industry at large. Being number two definitely makes The Bedford representative work harder! I doubt she takes a breath during the first ten weeks of any semester, when teachers and departments are considering books, because she seems to be in ten places at once.

But I drift from my topic, which is how the merger of two giants is going to change things. If the practice of only one submission per editor per house per megalithic publishing company holds as standard practice, agents already in the business will be relying even more (like they don’t already) on the 20% income from paychecks of writers who have already made it in the business,  New agents will. . . .

You fill in the blank. It is a changing industry. As long as people want to write, and people want to read, there have got to be ways that new writers come to the notice of readers. I honestly do not know where that will leave agents.

6 thoughts on “Another Seismic Shift in Publishing Land: How Will it Affect Writers and Agents?

  1. Julia is right of course, I fully agree. I am in the process of marketing a new novel which is both timely and socially relevant. I’ve sent out about 25 queries in the past two months, taking care to follow each particular agent’s instructions for said queries. I also went the extra mile this time, opting to research each agent to see what they’re selling, and, when possible, reading their personal blogs to find out more about them. Of those twenty-some, four agents took the the time to actually respond with a personal note. No thanks each time, but at least they bothered to respond and thank me for my query. The others sent what were obvious form email rejections or nothing at all. One agent responded less than two minutes after I hit the send button–a new record. So where do we go from here? I will think about it and write a follow up post to Julia’s well thought out piece by the end of this week.

    Like

  2. Even if they got 200 queries a day, with technology of today there is no reason why they shouldn’t respond to every query. Fine if it takes 6 weeks to get back to you. Just some response. Even if they don’t have time to read it, send that response back, or close the address to queries. The writer in most cases took the time to choose the agent and to release their precious, time-intensive work to them, each writer deserves some response. (minus the bulk senders). I’ve always felt that process disrespects writers work as a whole.

    Like

  3. Hey JD, I agree, have you checked out how many queries agents get a week? One pretty well known agent showed her stats: average 200 queries a week. Average request for a partial: one a week.
    It is a hard business. At least writers can be supportive to each other. Don’t forget your writing friends when you’re a famous literary name.

    Like

  4. You are so right, Julia. And another reason that self-publishing and e-publishing grows more and more attractive and beneficial to writers.

    Like

  5. I hope that agents are revamping the whole process by which they work with and help writers. I never felt the whole query letter – slush pile – no response means rejection method was very fair It is a downright terrifying process, trying to get an agent.

    Like

Leave a comment