Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

I want you to know that your book is amazing and I’m sure you’ve heard that before. It sent me through a roller coaster of emotions. I was mad and sad and happy and laughed it was so awesome. You should! It’s great. It’s something people need to hear. The young marriages, motherhood, loneliness, everything in it was so great. It really kept me interested, and shocked at some of the things in there I just can’t believe how people weren’t accepting. It really broke my heart. In the beginning I had so much hope of a beautiful love story, I still thought you guys would get through everything and be together. It’s like even though I knew how it ended I was still stuck on the book and wanted you guys to end up together. Your writings are wonderful, you truly brought the old days as well as the days you were there to life. I felt as if I was a fly on the wall, even as an outsider I felt as if I was right there with you. –Veronika D.cat_and_dog_in_library

Read Full Post »

As a writer/teacher/writing judge who goes through over a hundred books a year, I have noticed a BIG mistake made by excellent writers, a mistake that is reflected in their Amazon selling score (the easiest way for me to figure out how they are doing).

Successful authors don’t make this mistake.

Writers who are not friendly and findable on the internet do not do well. Do I hear you muttering, “J.D. Salinger”? Oh please. That was eons ago. The way books sell has changed and you know it.

J.K. Rowling and Stephen King agree with me. They are findable online and, presuming they read all the tweets, they can get your message–hence, they are friendly.

Karen Armstrong, author of a ton of books including Fields of Blood, accepted my friend request on Facebook. I was stunned. Geraldine Brooks, author of Year of Wonders wrote back to me when she found my letter after a move. I had chalked up her silence to author aloofness. The letter gave me tingles.

I still have it. Geraldine Brooks wrote to me! Wow!

Mark Anderson, author of the amazing Shakespeare by Another Name, opened a Facebook page for his book and responded to me and my son because we both adore his book. That Facebook page became a circle that was retitled Shakesvere.73159._UY475_SS475_

Often when I read books by struggling authors with great voices, and then try to find those authors online, I can’t. Francis Coco wrote the stunning Cheeking My Meds. I would love to reach out to her, but the Amazon author page offers a useless link to an artist colony where I cannot fid her name, which is actually Penni Goode Evans. This happens to me more than I would like to say.

When I DO find a talented author and want to be friends, said person either turns away, doesn’t understand the value of networking or pooh poohs all my networking ideas.

When I write about a book on this blog and the author is disinterested in returning the favor, I wonder if all the brilliance that person possessed was used up by writing the book.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Beacon Books has just announced publication of my newest book, hooray! Click on the link to see the book trailer.BB-2

 

Read Full Post »

18402649_643085942558265_6071952483121272405_n.pngPlease vote for the cover you find most engaging for my newest book children’s book, The Burning Boats. This contest takes place on Facebook at Beacon Books and voting is determined by the icon you choose:

The Burning Boats

Read Full Post »

I adore my students, which I prove by often posting their amazing essays. However, some of what a teacher does takes work and results in stress. I put the following question to my very talented friend Heather Jamieson Brown, who was once one of my students, and who is now one of my favorite writers. She is currently writing a two-book Western romance. 1378298_10201520866455379_1600872193_n

Me:
Why do I need Tylenol and why do I have to lie down after every editing and grading every two research papers? Why does my digestion more or less stop this time of the semester? Am I weird?

Heather: Good question. My prayers are with you.

Me: Lol thanks for approving the question oh Madame Brainiac. But WHY???

Heather:
Oh, I thought it was a rhetorical question lol. Hmm…I haven’t finished my coffee yet, but I shall try to come up with a scientifically sound answer for you. Ahem….. the medula oblingata is the part of the brain that controls involuntary things like breathing and digestion, etc. Yours, I think, is hypersensitive. You are artistic so you are naturally a very sensitive person. Beautiful things affect you deeply just as terribly ugly things do to an even deeper degree when it involves writing. When you are working on those research papers, and many of them are trash, it affects your whole system. For you, reading a terribly written research paper is the same as witnessing a horrible multi-vehicle accident where bodies are torn apart and flung through the air. When a student destroys a perfectly good statement with a comma splice, your medula oblingata goes into spasms, causing your intestines to go into contractions and you end up in physical distress.

Me to my readers: I love this woman. She is one of my favorite writers and as you can see, oh agents and editors of the world, hilarious!

Read Full Post »

Arendt

The Psychological Toll of Concentration Camps

by Vanessa Shubin ( a wonderful student essayist)

A human being can become accustomed to any depth of depravity and horror. It is unfortunate but also true that many people have the natural inclination to go along with authority figures no matter their level of personal emotional distress. Not only did the Holocaust affect the individuals who lived through it, but it has also impacted those who were connected to those fortunate to survive through this time of fear. Hannah Arendt’s Total Domination paints a perfect, yet frightening, image of the people subjected to the terror of concentration camps.

Many have heard the popular saying “time heals all wounds” but when it comes to Holocaust survivors, this might not be the case. Time cannot cure survivors’ traumas because the Holocaust has left such deep scars on their minds. The Holocaust is the biggest trauma in survivors’ lives and changes their destinies. They lost everything including their family members, relatives, houses, properties, jobs, businesses, social positions, and future. No matter how many years pass, the damage cannot be erased in survivors’ minds. Hannah Arendt writes, “The end result in any case is inanimate men… who can no longer be psychologically understood, whose return to the… human world closely resembles the resurrection of Lazarus,” (Arendt, 286). This excerpt gives the reader a clear example of not on the psychological but the psychical affects the survivors had to live with after the liberation of the concentration camps.

When the survivors integrated back into society after the war, they found it very hard to adjust. It was made difficult by the fact that they often induced uncertain feelings of fear, avoidance, guilt, pity, and anxiety. This might have been hard for them, but decades after the Holocaust most of the survivors managed to rehabilitate their capacities and rejoin the paths their lives might have taken prior to the Holocaust. This is more true for the people who experienced the Holocaust as children or young adults. The experience of the Holocaust shows how human beings can undergo extreme traumatic experiences without suffering from a total regression and without losing their ability to rehabilitate their ego strength. The survivors discovered the powers within them in whatever aspect in their lives that were needed.

The treatment that the survivors had to undergo could leave anyone fearful. Arendt writes, “The murderer leaves a corpse behind and does not pretend that his victim has never existed; he wipes out any traces… of his own identity… he destroys a life,” (Arendt, 287). The measures that the Nazis went through to treat the prisoners as if they’re lives were worth less, or worth nothing to be more specific, were outrageous. Arendt continues to advise the reader that the real horror of concentration camps lie “in the fact that the inmates… are more effectively cut off from the world of the living than if they had died, because terror enforces oblivion,” (Arendt, 288). In the concentration camps, murder was an everyday thing, just how waking up and going to work is for most of us nowadays, and that fact is shocking.

When looking at it from a general point of view, the survivors, for the most part have shown to be as strong as humanly possible. Not one person who hasn’t seen what they saw can possibly imagine how they feel. These people were lucky to have survived but there is no doubt that there have been times when their memories have made them think otherwise.

Works Cited

Arendt, Hannah. “Total Domination.” A World of Ideas edited by Lee Jacobus. Bedford/St.Martins, 2013. Pp 279-290.

Read Full Post »

arendt      As an American born in the 20th century, I am familiar with concentration camps. I am familiar in the Hollywood fashion, and through the books I have read. Despite this familiarity, I cannot conceive of the horror of concentration camp life. What I have seen in newsreels of World War II or have read in books defies my imagination. I do not want to imagine myself starving, without privacy, books, clothes, music, or decent hygienic shelter. I cannot imagine how awful it must be to be in such physical misery, surrounded by similar misery, and to simultaneously be the object of derision, apathy and torment. In such a condition, I suspect I would wonder if I were a human being. The Jewish writer Hannah Arendt describes concentration camps as bad as this and worse; she explains that the ones created in Germany for the Jews were the result of totalitarianism, which is a kind of government that wields its force through domination over its people. The resulting terror produced by totalitarianism stamps out individuality and propagates a kind of strength that is destructive rather than enriching to the human spirit.

Hannah Arendt explains that total domination has as its objective to treat all human beings as if they were just one individual (para 2, 282). “Conformity” is the word that comes to mind to explain what she means by this. She writes that totalitarian domination uses ideological domination of the “elite formations,” (para 2, 282) two words signifying all militants serving the ideology. On the opposite end of the spectrum, totalitarian domination uses terror to dominate anyone not serving or sustaining the ideology. Before investigating what the results of such a strategy would be, it behooves anyone contemplating totalitarianism to wonder why a nation would wish to embrace such a technique.

We can find the answer on the school yard. Bullies dominate by creating scapegoats. The purpose of their domination is power. Those who follow and back up bullies emulate them, thus embracing the bully ideology, as thin as that is. Bullying has no particular benefit to the school yard save the immediate sense of superiority it gives those who embrace and employ its techniques. Successful bullying grants material gain to the bullies, even good grades, if they learn how to employ their techniques to that end. However, bullying does not nourish individuality, neither for the bully nor for anyone on his or her path. Anyone who can, will avoid, even ignore, the bully because contemplation of his or her dominance is painful and begs for heroism, taking time away from the simple pleasures and necessities of living. Even in this effect, the bully eradicates individuality by quelling other voices. Without individuality, there is no flourishing of creativity, no diversity, only swaggering on the part of one type of individual, and cowering and/or survival tactics adapted by all others until such time as the bully determines to eliminate those not in conformity.

Hannah Arendt makes clear that any nation wishing to embrace total domination must play with reality. Lies and truth must become interchangeable. She writes, “Hitler circulated millions of copies of his book in which he stated that to be successful, a lie must be enormous—“(para 6, 284). In Total Domination, Arendt explains that the path of totalitarianism goes through stages, with “the initial stage of totalitarian rule serv[ing . . .] the exclusive purpose of defeating the opponent” (para 7, 284). Reality must be manipulated in order to make the populace doubt itself as well as to eliminate those whose diversity and individuality undermines the total domination of the state. Arendt points out that suppression takes many forms and that concentration camps are not an invention of totalitarian movements: ”They emerge for the first time during the Boer War, at the beginning of the century, and continued to be used in South Africa as well as India for ‘undesirable elements,” primarily for putting out of sight those people who “could not be sentenced by ordinary process of law” (285).

An ideology is useful to a totalitarian government. When that ideology revolves around a certain skin color, sex, ethnicity or narrow interpretation of a single religion, anyone who does not possess that color, sex, ethnicity or narrow interpretation will be denied human status through means of terror. A change in psychology happens to anyone who is subject to terror, the most extreme example being in the concentration camp. It is commonly known that abused spouses, through the process of being conquered and maligned, accept their status, as do abused children. If inhabitants of the concentration camp are kept out of sight, there will be no one to think about or stand up for them. They will become objects of suffering, without human status. Every shred of individuality, which made them human in terms of reasoning and creativity, will be stripped away. Keeping this process out of the public eye is necessary to the totalitarian state in order to not burden its followers with the temptation to reason; as for the oppressed, total domination strips away from them the basic concept of, and belief in, their own human rights.

(new page)  Works Cited
Arendt, Hannah. “Total Domination.” A World of Ideas edited by Lee Jacobus. Bedford/St.Martins, 2013. Pp 279-290.

–written for my students. Headers missing. Indents won’t work so I have added space breaks. However, there are no space breaks in MLA formatting.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »